The Ethics of Friction

In our 16 years of designing digital products, the UX industry mantra has almost always been remove the friction. We’re consistently reminding ourselves and each other to obsess over making things slicker, more seamless, and simpler. Think Uber, ClickUp or Airbnb.
But is there such a thing as too much?
As we move into an era of high-speed automation and AI, we’re discovering something surprising. Sometimes, the most user-centric thing you can do is actually slow people down.
While a frictionless user experience is great for ordering a pizza, it can be dangerous when applied to sensitive data, financial commitments or ethical choices. Now Boarding believes that Strategic Friction and Ethical Friction are not bugs; they’re critical tools for protecting users and building long-term trust.
Understanding people is part and parcel of user-centric design. Knowing how to clear the path, reduce negative emotions, instil a sense of scarcity and urgency or create excitement about what users are about to do are all tactics to optimise conversion.
This is fantastic, until it’s too much. Until it manipulates instead of eases. Until it encourages people to overlook important information that they’ll no doubt care about later. Until it aims to get people stuck in a hit of dopamine loops that they can’t get out of…
When a product is too easy to use, we often operate on autopilot. This is fine for low-stakes interactions, but high-stakes decisions require System 2 thinking - slow, deliberate, and logical.
If your UX allows a user to delete their entire project history or spend $1,000 with a single accidental swipe, you haven't created a "seamless" experience; you’ve created a hazardous one. Strategic friction forces a moment of reflection, ensuring that the user’s action aligns with their genuine and logical intent.
The industry is currently grappling with dark patterns - design choices that trick users into doing things they didn’t intend to do (like sign up or pay) and making it impossible for users to undo or cancel.
The cognitive load theory suggests our working memory has a limited capacity. This means that too much information too quickly, will not be absorbed. So, when we rush users through a complex onboarding or a legal agreement, we overload them into "I agree" fatigue.
By introducing micro-learning and breaking information into smaller, digestible chunks, we actually use friction to improve retention. Slowing the pace allows users to process knowledge effectively rather than just clicking "next" until they reach the end.
Strategic friction should be a documented part of your Design System. Just as you have standardised buttons for "Success," you should have standardised "Speed Bumps" for high-risk actions.
You might worry that adding friction will hurt your ROI. However, the data suggests otherwise:
If you need a hand, you know where to find us!
checkin@nowboarding.io